Помня Прошлое, Созидая Будущее, Жить Настоящим!

Помня Прошлое, Созидая Будущее, Жить Настоящим!

Традиция - Революция - Интергация

Вы, Старшие, позвавшие меня на путь труда, примите мое умение и желание, примите мой труд и учите меня среди дня и среди ночи. Дайте мне руку помощи, ибо труден путь. Я пойду за вами!

Наши корни
: Белое Дело (РОВС / РОА - НТС / ВСХСОН), Интегральный национализм (УВО / УПА - ОУН / УНСО), Фалангизм (FET y de las JONS / FN), Консервативная революция (AF / MSI / AN / ELP / PyL)
Наше сегодня: Солидаризм - Традиционализм - Национальная Революция
Наше будущее: Археократия - Энархизм - Интеграция

23 дек. 2007 г.

JEWS in K.G.B.

“Как представитель одной из традиционных религий России не могу не отметить вклад Федеральной службы безопасности в предотвращение преступлений, совершаемых под псевдорелигиозными и националистическими лозунгами”, - отметил Берл Лазар в своем поздравлении директору ФСБ Н. Патрушеву по случаю 90-летия ведомства.

16 дек. 2007 г.

Jushchenko! - Tak?


Надзвичайно цікава художня стаття Сергій Рахманіна.
Віктор Андрійович — зовсім інший типаж. Він — класичний приклад пана. Такий собі сучасний Манілов, який живе у світі абстрактних прожектів і розмірковує, наскільки український народ гармоніює з українською природою. Тільки пан може собі дозволити витійствувати про проблеми бездомних дітей із келихом французького шампанського в руці за столом, який вгинається від наїдків. Вартість якого порівняна з місячним (а може, і річним) бюджетом дитячого будинку. Пан не відчує в цьому протиріччі нічого неприродного. Він його не побачить. У цьому — його щастя і біда для оточуючих.

UNA - UNSO


13 дек. 2007 г.

"Россия и мир будут потрясены убийством Владимира Путина"

Сегодня в Вашингтоне будет представлен доклад "Альтернативные сценарии будущего России", подготовленный авторитетным неправительственным Центром стратегических исследований. Наряду с традиционной критикой российской демократии отдельные оценки доклада звучат фантастически. Самая скандальная из них -- предположение о том, что президент РФ Владимир Путин будет убит 7 января 2008 года в Москве. Накануне обнародования доклада его текст оказался в распоряжении собкора Ъ в Вашингтоне ДМИТРИЯ Ъ-СИДОРОВА.Авторами последнего 59-страничного исследования по России стали ведущие американские кремленологи -- директор российской и евро-азиатской программы Центра стратегических исследований Эндрю Качинс, бывший директор по России Совета по национальной безопасности США Томас Грэм, профессор международных отношений Университета Джорджа Вашингтона Генри Хейл, старший эксперт Института мировой экономики Питерсена Андерс Аслунд и другие. На обложке отчета размещены пять фотографий, по мнению авторов и издателей представляющих собирательный образ России. На них запечатлены российский президент Владимир Путин на встрече лидеров G8 и на встрече с председателем КНР Ху Цзиньтао, недавний арест лидера "Другой России" Гарри Каспарова, покрытые снегом нефтяные вышки и учительница с детьми в компьютерном классе.Несмотря на то что предложенные американскими экспертами сценарии развития России местами заметно отличаются друг от друга, отражая личную точку зрения того или иного автора, по ряду принципиальных моментов исследователи придерживаются единой позиции. Так, авторы уверены в том, что в ближайшие десять лет Россия не станет зрелой демократией. Что же касается нынешней политической стабильности, то авторы не считают ее достаточно устойчивой. Одна из причин заключается в том, что в определении политической линии страны слишком большую роль играют не институты власти, а отдельные личности. Кроме того, как поясняет Андерс Аслунд, "напряженность в отношениях между централизованной политической системой и рыночной экономикой, базирующейся на частном предпринимательстве, ослабнуть не может". Одной из главных проблем российской экономики господин Аслунд называет "агрессивную ренационализацию", по его мнению, негативно влияющую на корпоративное управление и экономическую эффективность.Впрочем, наиболее скандальную часть исследования составляют рассуждения о будущем российской политики и ее главных действующих лиц. По мнению Томаса Грэма, "Владимир Путин мягко передаст власть выбранному им преемнику и начнет тихо уходить со сцены по мере консолидации власти новым президентом". Как считает господин Грэм, преемник Владимира Путина будет возглавлять страну на протяжении восьми лет, после чего так же мягко передаст власть следующему выбранному им кандидату в президенты.Диссонансом этому довольно спокойному сценарию звучит версия, выдвинутая Эндрю Качинсом. Автор, известный своими политическими прогнозами, выступил в несвойственной ему роли гадалки. Он предсказал, что "Россия и мир будут потрясены убийством Владимира Путина на выходе из храма Христа Спасителя после полуночной мессы 7 января 2008 года". Господин Качинс считает, что убийцы Владимира Путина найдены не будут, а Россию сразу же охватит хаос, в результате которого произойдет обвал биржевого рынка, начнутся массовые забастовки и демонстрации, которые приведут к введению в стране чрезвычайного положения 20 января 2008 года. Высказывая предположение, что "убийство Владимира Путина нарушит планы спокойной передачи президентской власти Сергею Нарышкину и премьерской -- Дмитрию Медведеву", Эндрю Качинс прогнозирует в связи с этим "укрепление в Кремле позиций силовиков, к которым относятся Игорь Сечин, Виктор Иванов и Николай Патрушев" (назвав преемником Владимира Путина Сергея Нарышкина, а не Дмитрия Медведева, Эндрю Качинс как минимум в одном своем прогнозе уже ошибся).По мере изложения последующих вероятных событий прогноз Эндрю Качинса становится все больше похож на лихо закрученный сюжет боевика. По его версии, после введения в стране чрезвычайного положения "президентом РФ станет Владимир Якунин (ныне -- президент ОАО РЖД.-- Ъ), по приказу которого будут не только расстреляны бастующие нефтяники в Сургуте, но и приговорены к смерти за хищение миллиардов долларов Валентина Матвиенко (губернатор Санкт-Петербурга.-- Ъ) и Юрий Лужков (мэр Москвы.-- Ъ)". Господин Качинс предсказывает, что эти трагические события будут сопровождаться значительным ростом национализма в России. Однако после серии политических и экономических потрясений в 2016 году наступит хеппи-энд: с помощью и на средства выпущенного на свободу экс-главы Михаила Ходорковского президентом России станет Борис Немцов (член политсовета СПС) и его демократическая команда.Самое удивительное, что при всей фантастичности описанного им сценария Эндрю Качинс, бывший глава Фонда Карнеги в Москве, является одним из самых информированных и авторитетных американских кремленологов. Он участвует практически во всех крупных международных конференциях по России. Накануне июльского 2006 года саммита G8 в Санкт-Петербурге господин Качинс обратился с личным посланием к Владимиру Путину, в котором поучал российского президента, как соблюдать демократические принципы, и убеждал, что Америке вовсе не нужна слабая Россия, как полагают в Кремле. Несмотря на последовательную критику "суверенной демократии", Эндрю Качинс продолжает входить в узкий круг западных экспертов, которые ежегодно встречаются с Владимиром Путиным на заседаниях так называемого Валдайского клуба. В этом году на заседании клуба, проходившем в сочинской резиденции Владимира Путина "Бочаров ручей", именно господин Качинс задал российскому президенту вопрос, в чем состоит "план Путина" -- не в том ли, что "Единая Россия" должна не только выиграть парламентские выборы, но и стать правящей партией на несколько десятилетий.
http://www.rambler.ru/news/politics/putin/549379601.html

The Human Rights Fraud

The Human Rights Fraud
by Dr Tom Sunic

No verbal construct is so powerful and disarms so fully its critics as the expression “human rights.” Ever since the adoption of the UN Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, not a single government on Earth and not a single freedom loving academic has ever shunned this expression when raving about world improvement, or when wishing to improve his own lot. And yet, since the adoption of this human rights clause there has been a blatant increase in the violation of human rights. The answer to that is simple and does not represent a contradiction in terms. The lexical construct “human rights” is the most expedient tool for covering up abuses against specific rights of people. Today it has become a badge of honor for liberal plutocracy and its left-leaning scribes in search of a moral alibi for their military adventures or for their media mendacity. Upon closer grammatical scrutiny the lexical acrobatics of the “human rights” expression denote an abstract legal field that lends itself to a myriad of different definitions. Its generic nature precludes concrete rights of a given people, a nation, a race, a tribe, or a social group. The expression “human rights” is custom-designed for an uprooted and nameless individual or a dumbed-down consumer with no historical memory, and oblivious of his race and culture. It is a self-serving expression with different meanings in different social and historical contexts. For a Palestinian fellah living in a refugee camp on the West Bank, human rights have a different meaning from that of a neighboring Jewish-American settler whose long-distant cousins disappeared in Europe during World War II. For a Serb peasant human rights have one meaning; for a neighboring Albanian farmer yet another. For a DC pundit or a politician, human rights have a different resonance than for a poor white Oklahoma farmer who has been downsized, outsourced, or who has lost his job to illegal immigrants. The ideology of human rights is particularly well embedded in American legal practice. Its French replica les droits de l’homme (the “rights of man") would, if it were to be used now in the USA, render many feminists and bi-sexuals delirious. The American founding father Thomas Paine would likely be sued today for his work The Rights of Man, as his noun “man” smacks of a macho all-white society. Thus, this time around, Paine’s “man” would be castrated from his virile significance and replaced by the sexless if not transvestite adjective “human.” The Germans seem to be luckier as their compound noun “Menschenrechte” comes closer to the English human rights expression. Or, at least, so it was meant after the process of denazification, which was largely spurred by the Jewish-American Frankfurt School re-educators in post-war Germany. Many authors have argued that human rights are basically of that Biblical origin whose secular offshoots make up the cornerstone of modern liberal democracy. When examined closer, the ideology of human rights appears to be the most racist and the most exclusive belief, causing countless disasters and immeasurable disappointments. By its very nature the ideology of human rights posits that all people are equal—and therefore expendable. Its message conveys the illusion that every human being on Earth can and must be rich and handsome, and that he can change his social roles at will. Alas, a furtive look shows that people are not born equal - neither in their physique, nor in their genetic make-up! Somebody carries criminal chromosomes, which makes him a prime case for a future serial killer. Somebody is born with dolichocephalic face and a round shaped occiput, as is the case with many Europeans; somebody has a sloped forehead on his quasi Neanderthal skull. Somebody’s IQ shoots up to 150; somebody is a half-wit, more of a liability to his society than an asset to it. When put to practice in a multicultural society the dogma of human rights inevitably leads to social polarization, tensions and consequently to civil wars. Particularly barbaric is the dogma of human right during the state of war. Why? Let us pose a rhetorical question. What happens to individuals and people who are declared outside the category of “human beings”, as was the case with German civilians during World War II? No need for wild guesses. Labeled monsters and beasts by the Allies, Germans could do enter into the safe zone of human rights. Beasts and monsters must be obliterated, their cities phosphorized, their cultural heritage from Monte Cassino to Berlin museums must be targeted as an ultimate symbol of evil. On the academic level the same exclusionary schema applies. An academic or a free thinker showing doubts about the paradigm of human rights is immediately declared a “right-winger,” and by analogy a crank, a kook, a weirdo - a pathological case not worthy of any human rights. He is an alien who needs a psychiatric asylum at worst, or be submitted to “ethnic sensitivity training” at best. How on earth can a “Nazi” and, by lexical extension, his cousin “anti-Semite,” be viewed as a human being? He must be shut up for good. The flip-side of “human rights” is another lexical barbarism, notably the new expression “hate speech”, whose semantic elasticity makes a criminal of whosoever dares to challenge modern liberal mythology. The constant proliferation of such meaningless normative locutions serves as a shield for the liberal system, which similar to the ex-Soviet Union, carefully hides its totalitarian character. Eventually it will be destroyed by the very same masters of discourse who initiated this lexical and legal palaver.

12 дек. 2007 г.

Tzar Vova I Putin




Nordic Israel

http://www.nordish.net/snpa/chapter-IV9.htm

The Corded crania are larger than any from Egypt, and are metrically very similar to the Elmenteita skulls from East Africa - the two groups could be combined without loss of homogeneity. In Mesopotamia, they may be favorably compared with the three dynastic skulls from Ur, although they are higher vaulted than the other early groups.

Это цитата из Куна, одного из классиков современной антропологии.

Напомню, что родина Аврахама – “первого еврея” – город Ур халдейский, расположенный в Северной Месопотамии. Corded – это нордический расовый тип индоевропейцев (он отличен от современного хальштаттского нордического типа, который считается смесью corded и кроманьоидного типа; ближе к восточно-европейскому нордиду).

NS from Canada

Greetings National-Socialist comrades around the world:
I think the proposal to offer web space to comrades whose websites are forced down is an excellent idea. My hosting service is located in the US and is pretty good about the material we put on our website. Their only stated concern is about copyright. That is the only restriction I would put on any group whose site I would provide hosting for. With that one condition I offer our web space to whatever N-S group might need help in that way.We are in a real fight here in Canada about freedom of speech on the internet. Even though we host our sites in the US, the Canadian ZOG has developed laws whereby they can still charge us with 'discrimination' and/or 'hate'. Our Party website is under continual surveillance by both local police departments across Canada and by the national police. I myself currently have a 'discrimination' ruling against me which I have appealed to Federal Court and I have possible 'hate' charges pending against me. Our Party website was knocked down by hackers supported by the ZOG about a year ago.
However, we persevere!
Terry Tremaine (National Director, National-Socialist Party of Canada)
http://nspcanada.nfshost.com/

Z.O.G.

Check out www.zogsnightmare.com very interesting information, from a interesting source.

Left-wing Judge dismisses charge s against Marxist gang members

Three people were arrested for entering a Harrisburg, VA Barnes & Nobles book store wearing masks and screaming “nazi” at several customers. When police arrived, the masked men claimed that they had a tip that “nazis” were in the book store.
The men are identified as part of the “antifa” movement by a website for the left-wing gang “OPP”. “Antifa” is a euphemism for anyone belonging to an extreme left-wing gang. “OPP” identifies such people as Jared Taylor, Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan, and Steve Sailor as “nazis.” So pretty much anyone can be identified as a “nazi” who is to the right of Ted Kennedy.
Police arrived and two men were charged with felonies, and a third with a misdemeanor. Two of the three had entered Barnes & Nobles wearing masks over their faces which is a felony.
Judge William Heatwole of Rockingham General District Court, ordered the defendants never to return to the Barnes & Nobles, but dropped all criminal charges because, “you’re intentions were the best.”
Just imagine that members of the minutemen entered a book store wearing masks and screamed at people they suspected of being illegal aliens. Do you think for an instant thatJudge William Heatwole would drop the charges then?
Members of the “antifa” movement have been arrested for a wide array of violent crimes in the Northeast and the Northwest. Earlier this year, “antifa” gang members beat to death an Iraq War veteran for wearing a Lynard Skynard t-shirt with a small Confederate Flag on it in Massachusetts
http://www.dnronline.com/news_details.php?AID=13736&CHID=2

The unofficial visit of Lady Nibaal to Western Ukraine!

Lady Nibaal decided to honor us with her presence! During the course of her unofficial visit, the plans were made how to insure peaceful separation of Ingermalandia from Russia-Parasha. Ukrainian National-Socialists totally understand Russian patriots’ strive to rid their Motherland of racially deficient elements. We work hard on organizing the “robbery of the century”, which is meant to provide White patriots, who live on the edge of oicumena, with financial means of making the ideals of NS appealing to the wide range of racially conscious citizens. Lady Nibaal was guaranteed her share of the profit, which amounts to approximately $5 million. Unfortunately, Lady Nibaal had forgotten to leave her mailing address, upon her departure. We ask Russian patriots to bring to the attention of Lady Nibaal the fact that her share of the profit is going to wait for her in Private Bank’s safety deposit box. She can claim it at any time convenient to her.
OUN-UPA/ NSDAP.COM.UA

1 дек. 2007 г.

CHINA IS A REAL NATIONAL-SOCIALIST STATE!!!

Кстати, я удивляюсь почему наши поклонники Гитлера не обращают внимания на Китайскую Народную Республику, единственную реальную великую страну победившего национал-социализма.
Китай - настоящее, живое фашистское государство современности, там можно посмотреть на фашизм собственными глазами, и увидеть, что в нем плохого и что в нем хорошего.
Так называемая Коммунистическая Партия Китая - по сути своей фашистская партия, и всегда ею оставалась, на всех этапах развития. Если проанализировать программы КПК и Гоминьдана 20-ых годов, то легко убедиться, что реального различия между этими партиями нет, и обе партии национал-социалистические. Просто Гоминьдан планирует иметь союзников в Европе, а КПК - в России, но марксистским фразам Мао всегда приписывал сугубо фашиское значение, более того, Мао горячо доказывает, что марксизм неприменим в Китае, где нет пролетариата, и что классовое единство в Китае надо заменить на единство нации. Между прочим, Гоминьдан под Европой в основном понимал именно Германию, и вполне могла бы быть ее союзником во второй мировой, просто Гитлер, когда выбирал между Китаем и Японией, выбрал того, кто сильнее, а одновременно их нельзя было выбрать, так как китайские и японские фашисты усердно воевали друг с другом.
После победы левых национал-социалистов в 1949 году сразу выяснилось, что никакого коммунизма сталинского типа Мао строить не собирается, а он собирается быть фюрером китайского народа. Полной экспорприации капитала никогда не проводилось, после небольшой волны репрессий в 1960-ые, сравнимых с гитлеровскими, в 1970-ые государство возвращается к геббельсовской модели парнтерства государства и бизнеса (как Мао и обещал в 1930-ые). Краткий период повышения роли государства (с середины 1950-ых до примерно 1970 года) может быть объясним просто конкретными задачами национал-социалистической революции (как Мао кстати и объяснял), надо было переворошить страну, чтобы китайцы поверили в себя и в нацию. Очень быстро выяснилось, что национальное для этого государства важнее классового, это же наблюдается и сейчас. Массовых репрессий нет - так и у Гитлера не было в 1930-ых, пока война не началась. Антисемитизма нет - так это просто потому, что евреи никогда не образовывали в Китае значительных групп, влияющих на экономику. Можно не сомневаться, что если бы в Германии не было множества богатых евреев, у Гитлера не было бы и капли антисемитизма - евреи сами по себе его не интересовали, только как потенциальные враги германской нации. Нацменьшинства в Китае жмут совершенно успешно. Если представить, что китайская армия вошла, например в Индию, и там появились индийские партизаны, стрелять будут как Гитлер в Беларуси, причем китайцев даже и на грамм не будут смущать никакие европейские комплексы - в Азии всегда, когда надо, убивали хорошо, много, и без тени смущения. Поэтому КНР - страна воплощенного нацизма.
http://samir74.livejournal.com/1375741.html

INDO-EUROPA: Love your race!


SS: Silent Sirius

Алексей Ильинов
(Mesogaia-Sarmatia, г. Воронеж)
*ХЛЕБ НАШ ВАСИЛЬКОВЫЙ ДАЖДЬ НАМ ДНЕСЬ*
Так получилось, что мой давний-предавний знакомый основал целую «мистико-конспирологическую» анархо-организацию - Церковь «Краденый Хлебъ». Со своей символикой, ритуалами, «литургиями», лекционными курсами, радикально-авангардными арт-галереями и видео-акциями. Андреа Часовски, а именно так зовут моего знакомца (помимо этого, у него есть немало и других, не менее «своеобразных», сетевых имён), принадлежит к тому типу уникумов, для кого «оглашение хаосом» и сумасбродное «magick-оперативное мракобесие» являются смыслом всего их бытия. Им невыносимо тесно в узилище каких-либо ограничений и «норм», вознесённых до мертвящей, всеубивающей «догмы». Нет, «нормальными» они не станут никогда. «Нормальность» им попросту не грозит, ибо они давно уже избавились от неё, своевременно распознав обманку, завёрнутую в блестящую бумажонку и восхваленную чрезвычайно «высокими» словесами (а если за эти «словеса» ещё и платят?!)...
НОВУЮ СТАТЬЮ ИДЕОЛОГА И КРЕАТОРА "МЕЗОГЕИ-САРМАТИИ" АЛЕКСЕЯ ИЛЬИНОВА полностью читать тут
http://community.livejournal.com/silent_sirius/3389.html

CODREANU

"Корнеліу Кодряну. Мученик правої справи":
http://patriotukr.org.ua/patriotukr/index.php?rub=news_w&id=243
До 69-ої річниці з дня загибелі духовного провідника Нової Европи.

Zionism: National Socialism for Jews

The Jewish people have never had a friend in both fair and foul weather. Our allies have betrayed us, deserted us in our hour of need, and killed us in unprecedented numbers using crematoria and poison gas. To be Jewish is to know that wherever you go, you'll always have to watch your back.
Even in Israel we are persecuted by another ethnic group, the Arabs, who will not be happy until the last Jew is dead. In Europe, Nationalism is rising in Germany, Russia, France and the Netherlands. Soon there will be no tolerance left for Jews, and we will be exterminated.
Unless we take a stand.
National Zionism is a branch of Kahanism for Jews who don't want to take it lying down. Fight back. Fight for a Jewish state, and for Jewish freedom from all other races. In Israel, only the Jew is the master race, and all others are inferior.
Among Jews, those who are descended from the cohanim, or race of holy Jewish priests, are the equivalent to Aryans in European populations. Our master race will be made from cohanim for the sake of ensuring a Jewish homeland and preservation for Jewish children forever. Adolf Hitler had great wisdom when he realized that no ethnic group can exist without suppressing the inferior races, so that it can breed healthy generations of children in the future. Adolf Hitler was directly responsible for the founding of Israel. Of all the people who have ever dealt with Jews, Rabbi Meir Kahane and Adolf Hitler were the only two honest ones.
Things We Like
The Jewish Task Force - fighting to keep non-whites out of America and Israel's enemies far away.
Kahane.org - all Jews should read this to see what you're really fighting for.
The Jewish Defensive League - Protecting the rights of Jews to be free of intolerance and hate crimes.
Anti-Defamation League - fighting antisemitism, hatred, racism, andbigotry.
LNSG - Nazis who support Zionism. It's okay, we'll take the help.
Dr. Baruch Goldstein Memorial - he is a true hero for the Jewish race.

Vladimir Avdeyev: Race Scientist

Vladimir Avdeyev: Rasologia. Biblioteka rasovoy mysli, Moscow, 2007. 665 pages
a review by Jürgen Graf

Where in the world is it nowadays conceivable that a book about the inherent differences between the human races, which pays tribute to the racial theorists of the Third Reich and explicitly claims that all races are not equal, is not only openly sold in the bookstores but even becomes a bestseller? And where in the world is it possible that such a book is favorably reviewed by renowned scholars and provided with two introductions, one written by a member of parliament and the other one by a prominent representative of a liberal organization?
In Germany, Austria or France? Unthinkable! In these countries such a book would almost certainly be banned; its author would be put on trial for "racial discrimination" or "instigation of the populace"; any member of parliament who would have the audacity of endorsing its contents by writing an introduction would immediately be castigated as a "racist bigot" by the media and would have to relinquish his seat in parliament within days.
In the Anglo-Saxon world? Not impossible, but highly unlikely. It is quite true that the English-speaking countries enjoy much greater freedom of thought and speech than the German-speaking ones or France. In the USA, the First Amendment to the Constitution would certainly protect the author of such a book from legal persecution; in Britain or Canada, there are laws against "racism", but the author of a scholarly work about race would hardly be prosecuted on the basis of these laws. On the other hand, the media would either ignore or angrily denounce his book without discussing his arguments, and he would risk social ostracism. This is exactly what happened in the United States to Arthur Jensen and Hans Eysenck, two serious scientists who had dared to challenge the dogma of racial equality. They were pilloried as "racists" and "haters" and harassed by left-wing fanatics for whom rational arguments did not count. The late biologist Glade Whitney became the victim of a tremendous smear campaign after writing an introduction to David Duke's My Awakening. Only a handful of scholars or politicians will muster the courage to incur the wrath of the watchdogs of "political correctness".
In Russia? Yes, in Russia all this is perfectly possibly. The proof is Vladimir Avdeyev's books Rasologia, the second edition of which came out in late 2007 in Moscow.
Vladimir Borisovich Avdeyev was born in 1962, After acquiring a university degree in Economics, he served in the Soviet Air Force where he was promoted to the rank of First Lieutenant. Since 1993, he has been a member of the Russian Writers' Association; in 1991, he founded the journal Atenei together with his comrades-in-arms Anatoli Ivanov and Pavel Tulayev. Since 1999, V. Avdeyev has edited a series of books under the title "Biblioteka Rasovoy Mysli" (The Library of Racial Thought), and in 2005, the first edition of his Rasologia appeared. This book was highly successful, and already two years later its author was able to publish an improved and enlarged second edition. The two introductions were written by Andrey Savelev, a delegate of the Russian Duma {parliament) and close personal friend of Avdeyev, and by Valeri Solovei, a historian and member of the ultra-liberal Gorbachev Foundation, who aptly summarizes the book as follows:
"Humanity is entering a new epoch. The world that was shaped by the Enlightenment and Modernity using melodious words such as 'democracy', 'equality', 'progress' and 'human rights' is becoming part of a past that will never return. Together with this world, the scientific concepts and the intellectual ballast which belonged to it are doomed too. All this will be replaced by a world based on blood and soil, strength and hierarchy, which will need a new theory and new concepts."
Avdeyev's book is subdivided into eight chapters: 1) Racial Science and Anthropology: What are the differences? 2) The Fair Race: Historiography and Anthropology. 3) The Biological Foundation of the Northern Conception of the World. 4) Thoughts about Racial Prejudices. 5) A New Paradigm in Racial Science. 6) The Anti-Racial Myth of the "Melting Pot". 7) Racial-ideological Neurology, and finally, the striking chapter 8, A Racial Theory of Time. The book contains a large number of excellent photographs and illustrations.
For me as a non-specialist, who only had a very general knowledge of the question, Avdeyev's history of racial thought was particularly fascinating. I had erroneously taken it for granted that almost all racial theorists had been German and that the Frenchman Arthur de Gobineau ( Essay on the Inequality of the Races, 1855) and the Englishman Houston Stewart Chamberlain (Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, 1899) were exceptions. Thanks to Avdeyev, who has carefully studied the writings of all the important racial theorists, I learned I was wrong: the subject of race has been dealt with by numerous and illustrious French scholars, and the study of race flourished in Russia before 1917. Who would have guessed that the term "Nordic race" was not coined by a German, but by a Russian, Joseph Denniker (1852-1918)?
Being a Russian nationalist (nota bene, he is not a Russian chauvinist), Avdeyev objectively and impartially presents the works of all major racial theorists regardless of their countries of origin. He calls himself a "grateful student" of the "great theorists of race" to whom he dedicates his book. In my opinion, Avdeyev can best be characterized as a representative of "classical racial thought." Although a large part of the book summarizes and discusses the theories of his predecessors, it also contains many of his original thoughts. This is especially true of the fascinating final chapter, "A Racial Theory of Time."
The amount of solid information this book provides both to the specialist and to the interested layman is awesome -- and it will force the reader to jettison many a cherished yet erroneous belief.
I will confine myself to two errors Avdeyev clears up: Since the Soviet Union officially professed the strictly egalitarian doctrine of Marxism, we are naturally inclined to think that the study of racial differences was taboo under Soviet rule. But as Avdeyev shows, this is an error: During the Soviet period, scientific anthropology, which gave due credit to racial differences, was not only not oppressed, but even encouraged.
Second example: As National Socialist Germany saw in Bolshevist Russia its arch-enemy, one might presume that in the Third Reich scientists were strictly forbidden to quote Soviet sources. As a matter of fact, one of the leading German racial theorists, Fritz Lenz, quoted no fewer than 34 works of Soviet scientists in his seminal study " Menschliche Erblichkeitslehre" ["A Theory of Human Heredity"], which he wrote in 1932. This fact did not prevent Lenz from becoming highly respected after Hitler's assumption of power.
Some people may argue that a book such as Avdeyev's has no practical value, and they may ask "what good does it do?" My answer to this objection is the following:
Firstly, true science enriches our knowledge, and knowledge is always valuable, regardless of whether it offers material advantages or not. When an ornithologist discovers a truly new kind of bird, this will be reported by the major media around the world, although this discovery does not benefit us materially. And if it is useful to add to our knowledge of birds, it is undoubtedly even more useful to increase our knowledge of man -- of ourselves.
But there is more. A correct understanding of race and racial differences is of tremendous importance because we thereby recognize certain extremely grave errors Western society has committed, and this understanding equips us to remedy them. The fallacious doctrine of racial equality, which has been promoted for decades by the followers of Franz Boas, has caused pernicious political consequences. It has made possible the catastrophe of forced racial integration in the USA, which has done immeasurable harm to both the white and the black populations, and it has paved the way for massive third-world immigration into Europe, North America and Australia. What is happening before our eyes in France is the handwriting on the wall. Race does matter, whether or not some people want us this.
With his book, which is the fruit of many years of hard study, Vladimir Avdeyev has rendered to science, and to us all a grand service. His work deserves to be translated from Russian into English and into all the other major Western European languages.
Vladimir Avdeyev can be reached at avd999@yandex.ru

IHR NEWS

IHR News and Comment A free public service of the Institute for Historical Review November 30, 2007

America in the Time of Empire Chris Hedges
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20071126_america_in_the_time_of_empire/
All great empires and nations decay from within. By the time they hobble off the world stage, overrun by the hordes at the gates or vanishing quietly into the pages of history books, what made them successful and powerful no longer has relevance. This rot takes place over decades, as with the Soviet Union, or, even longer, as with the Roman, Ottoman or Austro- Hungarian empires. It is often imperceptible. Dying empires cling until the very end to the outward trappings of power. They mask their weakness behind a costly and technologically advanced military. They pursue increasingly unrealistic imperial ambitions.

'For Fear of the Jews' Joseph Sobran
http://www.ihr.org/conference/14thconf/sobranconf.html
The news that I would be addressing the Institute of Historical Review came to some people as, well, news ... The IHR's mission can't be fairly summed up as "Holocaust denial." Its real mission is criticism of the suffocating progressive ideology that has infected and distorted the telling of history in our time ... In short, the Holocaust has become a device for exempting Jews from normal human obligations. It has authorized them to bully and blackmail, to extort and oppress.

The Secret History of the Impending War with Iran John H. Richardson
http://www.esquire.com/features/iranbriefing1107
In the years after 9/11, Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann worked at the highest levels of the Bush administration as Middle East policy experts for the National Security Council ... But when they left the White House, they left with a growing sense of alarm -- not only was the Bush administration headed straight for war with Iran, it had been set on this course for years. That was what people didn't realize. It was just like Iraq, when the White House was so eager for war it couldn't wait for the UN inspectors to leave. The steps have been many and steady and all in the same direction. And now things are getting much worse. We are getting closer and closer to the tripline, they say.
A Plan to Attack Iran Swiftly and From Above Paul Koring -- The Globe and Mail (Canada)
A bombing campaign has been in the works for months - a blistering air war that would last anywhere from one day to two weeks. / Massive, devastating air strikes, a full dose of "shock and awe" with hundreds of bunker-busting bombs slicing through concrete at more than a dozen nuclear sites across Iran is no longer just the idle musing of military planners and uber-hawks. Although air strikes don't seem imminent as the U.S.-Iranian drama unfolds, planning for a bombing campaign and preparing for the geopolitical blowback has preoccupied military and political councils for months. No one is predicting a full-blown ground war with Iran.

Democrats the Party of the Rich, New Study Shows The Washington Times
Democrats like to define themselves as the party of poor and middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts. In a state-by-state, district-by-district comparison of wealth concentrations based on Internal Revenue Service income data, Michael Franc, vice president of government relations at the Heritage Foundation, found that the majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional jurisdictions were represented by Democrats.

One Million Dead in Iraq: America's 'Holocaust Denial' Mark Weisbrot
http://www.alternet.org/audits/68568/
Institutionally unwilling to consider America's responsibility for the bloodbath, the traditional media have refused to acknowledge the massive number of Iraqis killed since the invasion. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad's flirtation with those who deny the reality of the Nazi genocide has rightly been met with disgust. But another holocaust denial is taking place with little notice: the holocaust in Iraq. The average American believes that 10,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed since the US invasion in March 2003. The most commonly cited figure in the media is 70,000. But the actual number of people who have been killed is most likely more than one million.

Man Cleared in Suicide of German 'Anti-Semitic' Professor Haaretz (Israel) http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/924896.html
The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg Thursday acquitted an Austrian journalist of "causing the suicide" of a German professor [Werner Pfeifenberger] who claimed that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933. The ruling was handed down in a complicated case involving freedom of speech, libel and anti-Semitism. The court found in favor of veteran journalist Karl Pfeifer, ruling that Austrian courts failed to protect Pfeifer's good name. The court ordered the Austrian government to pay Pfeifer 5,000 euros in damages and 10,000 euros in court costs.

German Professor, Accused of Revisionism, Commits Suicide Mark Weber (2000)http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n3p24_Weber.html
Werner Pfeifenberger, a German professor of political science, took his life in Austria on May 13, 2000, a few weeks before he was to go on trial in Vienna for an allegedly revisionist and "neo-Nazi" essay published five years ago. The 58-year-old scholar was scheduled to appear on June 26 before a district criminal court, where he faced up to ten years imprisonment for a 1995 writing that allegedly violated Austria's anti-Nazism law. His attorney said that Pfeifenberger, fearing an unfair trial, had announced his intention to take his life.

Cheering for Ron Paul Robert Scheer
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071203/truthdig
... Until the leading Democratic candidate faces up to the irreparable harm that will be done to needed social programs over the next decades by the red-ink spending she supported, I will be cheering for the libertarian Republican. At least he won't throw more money down some foreign rat hole.

US is 'Worst' Imperialist, Says Anglican Leader The Times (Britain)http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/co
The Archbishop of Canterbury has said that the United States wields its power in a way that is worse than Britain during its imperial heyday. Rowan Williams claimed that America's attempt to intervene overseas by "clearing the decks" with a "quick burst of violent action" had led to "the worst of all worlds". In a wide- ranging interview with a British Muslim magazine, the Anglican leader linked criticism of the United States to one of his most pessimistic declarations about the state of western civilisation. He said the crisis was caused not just by America's actions but also by its misguided sense of its own mission.

World Jewish Congress Records American Jewish Archives
http://www.americanjewisharchives.org/aja/WJC
... The collection contains much documentation which illuminates that the WJC was more pro-active than scholars have previously held. Its leadership urged the President of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, to take on a leading role in publicly denouncing the Nazi regime and to promote political and military actions against Nazi Germany if Germany did not refrain from further persecution of European Jews ... The World Jewish Congress collection (1918- 1982) consists of the archival records of the New York office of the World Jewish Congress ... The purpose of the new organization was to unify Jews and strengthen Jewish political influence in order to assure the survival of the Jewish people.
Восточная Фаланга - независимая исследовательская и консалтинговая группа, целью которой является изучение философии, геополитики, политологии, этнологии, религиоведения, искусства и литературы на принципах философии традиционализма. Исследования осуществляются в границах закона, базируясь на принципах свободы слова, плюрализма мнений, права на свободный доступ к информации и на научной методологии. Сайт не размещает материалы пропаганды национальной или социальной вражды, экстремизма, радикализма, тоталитаризма, призывов к нарушению действующего законодательства. Все материалы представляются на дискуссионной основе.

Східна Фаланга
- незалежна дослідницька та консалтингова група, що ставить на меті студії філософії, геополітики, політології, етнології, релігієзнавства, мистецтва й літератури на базі філософії традиціоналізму. Дослідження здійснюються в рамках закону, базуючись на принципах свободи слова, плюралізму, права на вільний доступ до інформації та на науковій методології. Сайт не містить пропаганди національної чи суспільної ворожнечі, екстремізму, радикалізму, тоталітаризму, порушення діючого законодавства. Всі матеріали публікуються на дискусійній основі.

CC

Если не указано иного, материалы журнала публикуются по лицензии Creative Commons BY NC SA 3.0

Эта лицензия позволяет другим перерабатывать, исправлять и развивать произведение на некоммерческой основе, до тех пор пока они упоминают оригинальное авторство и лицензируют производные работы на аналогичных лицензионных условиях. Пользователи могут не только получать и распространять произведение на условиях, идентичных данной лицензии («by-nc-sa»), но и переводить, создавать иные производные работы, основанные на этом произведении. Все новые произведения, основанные на этом, будут иметь одни и те же лицензии, поэтому все производные работы также будут носить некоммерческий характер.

Mesoeurasia

Mesoeurasia
MESOEURASIA: портал этноантропологии, геокультуры и политософии www.mesoeurasia.org

How do you like our website?

>